Reconstruction scheme of enterprise multi-line local area network
In order to improve the speed of the network, some users blindly apply for more bandwidth, which is actually not enough. To ensure the speed of the local area network, bandwidth is indispensable, but the correct networking mode and management means are more important. In the current network environment, the exit bandwidth 500K/ people can fully meet the normal Internet needs, for example, 100 people 50m bandwidth, 50 people 20m bandwidth.
In this article, I will introduce a typical multi-line LAN transformation scheme.
1. Reconstruction plan
The unmodified LAN network structure looks something like this:
A local area network with less than 200 people has applied for a total of five 100m broadband; through five home routers connected to the layer 2 switch, the IP segment of the internal network has been arranged from 192.168.0.x to 192.168.5.x. The key problem is that surfing the Internet is still slow, especially during rush hours. The leadership learned from the bitter experience and decided to transform the network and audit the content on the Internet. After the analysis of our engineers, the following transformation scheme is adopted:
Replace the five existing routers with one WSG-500E.
Purchase another Huawei S5700 as the core switch and divide the departments into different VLAN.
The new network structure is as follows:
The WSG-500E has six gigabit ports, which happens to connect five external lines to the WSG-500E. The LAN port is connected to the layer 3 switch.
Assign a VLAN to each department on the S5700.
two。 On-site implementation
On-site implementation diagram:
Obsolete routers:
3. WSG related configuration
As the user is plagued by bandwidth problems, the configuration of diversion policy and priority is focused on in the configuration of WSG. The main contents are as follows:
Multi-line diversion is carried out according to departments, and each department takes its own line.
The bandwidth of R & D department and finance department is preferred.
Some relevant screenshots are as follows:
To sum up: after the above transformation, employees generally report that the network speed is very fast, there are no previous network problems, and the transformation is still very successful. The only problem is that layer 3 switches only play the function of VLAN division here, which is actually a bit wasteful, and it is more economical to replace it with a layer 2 switch that supports VLAN division.
