[award solicitation] the more practical the operation and maintenance staff are.
The more interesting the operation and maintenance staff are.
Cooking wine and tasting tea: this is a bullshit article, chatting and farting. It is also in response to the essay "IT Operation and maintenance Standardization and Safety"
The first thing I care about may be security, because I have done a lot of security before, and I have basically been involved in a security accident in the past three weeks. The website was implanted in the back door until the server was also implanted in the backdoor. *, lag keys, etc., all the static files of the network horse are basically hung up. 160W static files that are quite painful. Let's not talk about the process.
What is the relationship between security and operation and maintenance? security should be developed? Or should it be the security department? There may also be some, but if OPS does not pay attention to security, it will certainly be a disaster, because the permissions of OPS are often the largest in all departments, what is the largest, ROOT permissions, server permissions, SQL permissions, basically all online business operation and maintenance departments have permissions, and now major companies are paying more and more attention to security, why? There are basically two types of applications, one is the website source code (functional), the other is the data stored in the database, and the enterprise regards the data as the lifeline, so if it is hacked, then this lifeline will not belong to one person.
QQ group information disclosure and home Hanting room data was leaked, I took a look, QQ group information does not do much harm, ID,QQ number, QQ group number, QQ group name, group profile, and another is membership. There are a lot of things when you get a room.
So sometimes it's bullshit. If you lose the data, you don't have any responsibility. For example, if you lose the CSDN data, the bullshit becomes more and more popular. It's the same in the kitchen. If enterprises treat the crisis as a good public relations, then there will be more interests, so where should the operation and maintenance face these?
When it comes to standardization, it actually has something to do with safety. Only a standard process can reduce errors, and fewer errors will reduce security accidents.
From the perspective of security, the standard is actually a stream, from where to where, each node has its own rules. What should I do and what should I do? One gives birth to two, two to three, and three to all things, which is the law of the growth of all things. What is the standard of one? What to do to generate two without other problems, there may be a lot of problems in this process. And the operation and maintenance is in this process to formulate rules to minimize problems, but also to minimize man-made problems.
At the end of the gossip, there is no substance, it's just pure bullshit. Ha ha.
