Shulou(Shulou.com)11/24 Report--

Thanks to CTOnews.com netizens Wu Yanzu in South China for the delivery of clues! CTOnews.com June 13 news, Intel officials in AMD held a press release the day before the press release, sharing its Sapphire Rapids Xeon CPU and AMD EPYC Genoa "measured" running points comparison.

In the infographic, Intel compares 32-core Sapphire Rapids Xeon chips with 32-core AMD EPYC Genoa chips, and compares them according to AI scenario applications, workloads and TCO costs. CTOnews.com, according to media reports, is summarized as follows:

Intel, the AI smart benchmark, said that according to the AI benchmark, Intel Xeon 8462Y (Sapphire Rapids) CPU has 7.11 times the performance of AMD EPYC 9354 (Genoa).

Intel says Sapphire Rapids leads not only in overall performance, but also in performance per watt.

Workload: in workload scenarios such as SPECint to MySQL Casandra, as well as Microsoft SQL, GROMACS, LAMMPS, NAMD, and Monte Carlo, Intel Xeon processors perform 2.52 times as much as AMD EPYC and 2.51 times per watt.

TCO cost Intel shares said that obtaining Intel Xeon CPU based on its Sapphire Rapids series can save up to 8% in database (PostGreSQL), 35% in database (Microsoft SQL 2022 + QAT Backup), 38% in HPC (BlackScholes), 61% in AI (DLRM) and 79% in AI natural language (BertLarge).

Xeon Max 9480 CPU Intel also launched its flagship product Xeon Max 9480 CPU, which is equipped with packaged HBM memory and up to 56 cores, compared with AMD's fastest EPYC 9654 96-core CPU.

In the comparison of pure HPC workloads, the performance of Xeon Max chip is twice that of Genoa.

Welcome to subscribe "Shulou Technology Information " to get latest news, interesting things and hot topics in the IT industry, and controls the hottest and latest Internet news, technology news and IT industry trends.